Okay... not really... But... It makes an interesting title; so, I'll keep it. With Jennifer Hudson up for the Best Supporting Actress Academy Award for the role of Effie White in Dream Girls, which Jennifer Holliday won the Tony Award for Best Leading Actress in a Musical for in 1982, it seems only fitting that there be some kind of writing lesson here. So here's the lesson as far as I can piece it together.
You see, I read the article in Jet Magazine where Jennifer Holliday reflects on that moment. And while scholar/professor me would cringe at the thought of using Jet Magazine as a citation source, cultural critic me knows that the old saying "if you didn’t read it in Jet Magazine, it didn't happen in the black community" exists for a reason. And romance writer me, could care less about citation source blah, blah, blah. So, anyway... As the story goes, the character of Effie White may very well indeed have started out a "supporting role," a "side character" so to speak. But by the time Jennifer Holliday got done fighting for her character, the character had extra songs in the musical, more space to shine and most important, the character did not die.
When you add to this the fact that the original play is said to have been created for Nell Carter, and you know she wasn't going to play no Deena Jones... and you know she would have been the star not a supporting character... then the fact that the role of Effie has somehow become a supporting role seems all the more strange… but I digress… Because anyone who has seen the film knows that Jennifer Hudson's performance in this role, like Jennifer Holliday's before it, was not a "supporting character." She was the star of the film. The script and writing dictated it. If you take away the character Effie then you have no story. Adding the song "Listen" does not make Beyonce Knowles's portrayal of Deena Jones become the "lead" in the story. They needed to rewrite the script for that. And since I promised there would be a writing lesson here, I'll add that there is a certain finesse to writing truly supporting characters that Dream Girls, the film becomes the perfect "how not to" template for. In fact, the film breaks key supporting character rules that writers should be mindful of when they create side plots and side characters. First, your supporting characters are there for support. The main action should happen to the leads, your heros and heroines. In the beginning of the play and film, the action happens to the girl group and that is fine. But as we watch the film, where does the drama really unfold? Who do we find ourselves on the edge of our seats caring about, wondering what will happen next to her, damn near crying (okay, I really did cry, but I'll never admit it) for when life dealt her another blow? If you say anyone but Effie White, you're a liar and the truth ain't in ya! This leads me to the second supporting character rule, readers should like the support cast and be interested in them yes. But if the reader starts to like the supporting cast more than the lead… if we become more interested in what happens to the side characters and could care less if the so-called lead is there or not… we have a writing problem. I'm sure we've all read books where we've experienced this. We could care less about the hero or heroine but that spunky friend, that witty comrade, now that's someone we'd like to get to know. As writers, I'm sure we've all had side characters that are just begging for their own books. And most of us know how to give just enough of these characters so that they don't outshine the lead. Which leads me finally back to Dream Girls and the character Effie. She wasn't a supporting character in the play's debut in 1981. And no matter what they billing the film role today--or why they billed it that way--she is not a supporting character now. The play just wasn't written for her to be sidelined. The writing dictates that she's the star. The fighting that Jennifer Holliday did for the role back in the eighties demanded that the she be a star. The performance that both Jennifer's contributed to the role demands that they be awarded "Best Actress," not "Best Supporting Actress." But nevertheless, there are writing lessons to be learned by watching the film. I found one. Now, I can call watching the film writing research. ;-) What do you all think? Do you have any thoughts about supporting characters and side stories? Do you think Jennifer Hudson is being cheated of the rightful nomination of Best Actress? Do tell...
Saturday, February 17, 2007
I Learned Everything I Ever Needed to Know About Supporting Characters from Watching Dream Girls
Posted by Gwyneth Bolton at 10:46 AM
Labels: Commentary, Popular Culture
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I hear ya about supporting cast overshadowing the primary characters. I haven't seen Dream Girls (TV may go see it this weekend), but I've read plenty of books where I'd much rather know the story of one of the secondary characters. The most immediate one that comes to mind is Dara Joy's MATRIX series (which will probably never be written do to her 'issues' with Dorchester) and the character of Traed. The guy is sexy beyond belief, and I'm dying to read his story. He has major issues, many of which are hinted at in the first three books (KNIGHT OF A TRILLION STARS, REJAR, and MINE TO TAKE.) Suzanne Brockmann does a great job with secondary characters and subplots in her TROUBLESHOOTERS series (one of the Navy SEALs series she writes). . . I bought all the books until she resolved the Sam/Roger and Alyssa story. Five or six books. Hooked me in, reeled me in. Once their story was resolved, I stopped buying the books. That's how I'd like to write my books. That's how I hope I write my books.
Great blog, Gwyn.
That was a writing lesson indeed, but given that I don't write fiction, I see great potential for a rhetoric lesson as well. What rhetorical strategies did Holliday have to employ to move Effie from the tragic victim role to one of eventual empowerment? What oppositional world view did she use? What matrix of domination was she trying to combat?
Hmmmm.....
~I have spoken~
Great blog, G. I haven't watched DREAMGIRLS yet (can't seem to get a sitter these days) but might sneak in after the kids go to bed tonight or tomorrow after nine.
Secondary characters, hmm? I think Francis Ray's books did that to me. I read ONLY YOU and had to read all the other brothers' stories. I got hooked on her work.
I think sometimes you walk a tight-rope when you add a secondary character who takes a life of its own and become the focus of the story. If the reader starts rooting for him/her, you know you have the wrong hero/heroine. In my last book, my crit partners kept saying, "you need to write this other guy's story (the heroine's cousin)" and I was like, Oh crap. Let's hope my next editor doesn't think he's too dominant. I hate rewrites
I'm going to pick up several of your books, need to know if it matters which one I read first. My reading list keep growing, it's sad.
Sorry I tagged you, but that's what friends are for, to yank your chain once in a while.
Bella
Miz M ~ Thanks! You do write that way and soon the world will know! :-) I think you hit on the key point though, especially for series and connecting books. You do want to give the reader just enough so that they want to read the next books in hopes of finding out more about that intriguing side character. But you don't want them saying I wanted "this" book to be about the side character. It's tricky.
Tamika ~ Right! The rhetorician in me read that Jet Magazine article with great interests. The way she spoke about fighting for the character Effie and how it was a constant battle shows so much strength. The character was supposed to die in the original script, die broke and penniless. It made me wish that I could interview Holliday and find out the answers to all those questions you ask. Hmmm... that could make for an interesting paper down the line for a budding young scholar and rhetorician like yourself... Hmm...
Bella ~ Yes, great writers are excellent at giving us just enough to make us want to buy the next book and find out more but not taking anything away from the leads in the book you're reading. I think Brenda Jackson is a master at this with her Madaris, Westmoreland, and Steele series. And Rochelle Alers is also with the Hideaway series.
And as for my books, I don't think it matters which one you read first. The first three are so very different from one another in style and tone that I think it matters more what you are in the mood for or what you like to read. I'm Gonna Make You Love Me is light and kind of funny. It has a younger hero and heroine. If Only You Knew is true Harlequin style with high emotion, drama and passion. And Divine Destiny is erotic romance with some light bondage and spanking thrown in. Sweet Sensation and the novella in Cuffed by Candlelight are also sort of light and funny. And I'm Gonna Make You Love Me and Sweet Sensation are connecting books, but they are also stand alone reads.
And about the tagging... mmm hmmm... remember that when I tag you back... and I will tag you back... eventually... [insert evil laughter here] No, seriously, it's cool! I'll get it done this week so check back.
Gwyneth
Gwen,
Excellent lesson on writing. As someone is is 'semi' working on a series, it is important to make the reader want to know about the side characters, but not have them take over the book.
NOW
*clearing throat, pulling soap box closer to me, lifting my dress, and graceful stepping on my soapbox*
I HAVE seen the movie and the play. I was lucky to see it with Jennifer Holiday. Like I said before I was quite confused when Beyonce was getting all the attention and buzz came out about Jennifer Hudson's supporting role as Effie...
What the hell? Effie was the main charater. But I shrugged it off and instead focused on all the rave reviews of the movie.
I watched the movie and all the while i kept thinking "Did Beyonce read the script first?" Then I thought "Is this a based on a true story of Destiny's Child"
But anyway, I watched I enjoyed I applauded, and no I didn't cry (unlike others who shall remain nameless).
In the movie it showed how Deena was nothing more than a product of good marketing. (Sound like someone else we know?) What I find interesting is that the critics fell for the same false, "smoke and mirrors" marketing touched on in the film.
So Beyonce is a bigger name, Beyonce has marketed her self as "the star" and low and behold Beyonce gets credited as the lead actress when really she only has a supporting role.
Now if that isn't irony for that ass I don't know what is.
so lets bring it back around, I'm sorry but one scene by yourself does not make you the star. Nor does one solo (that by comparison I barely remembered)
In the movie Curtis and CC "decide" to make Deena a star (even though she wasn't.)
I wonder who was behind making Beyonce the star of the movie (even though she wasn't)
This is what we call Life imitating art.
So then why the hell is a mediocre supporting actress being billed as a phenomal lead actress? Well its all in the marketing and some great minds coming together to say she is the better image the better fit.
Meanwhile Effie...oops I mean Jennifer Hudson...opps I mean Effie...ooops I mean (hell its the same in the movie and in real life) has to take the backseat as the "background singer" or rather the supporting actress.
*exhales breath, steps down, and gently shoves soapbox underneath podium*
What is important to learn in writing when creating secondary characters. Give us enough to make us like them and care, but not more than the story you're telling.
However, as long as you have some kickass marketing well you can get pretty far.
K D King ~ Yes! You said it, girl! I'm gonna just go on ahead and cosign on everything you just said, and add an mmm hmmm and an amen for good measure. You just broke it down. And I love how you broke it down, just love it! Yep... yep... I honestly think that they thought by adding that song, "Listen" they would be able to make us believe that the character Deena was really the star... They needed a better song than that and a whole different script.
Haven't seen Dream Girls yet.
Loved Nell Carter. I was sad when she died. She was an adoptive mother too, wasn't she?
Kimber An,
Yes I believe she had two or three adoptive sons. It was really sad when she passed away....
Gwyneth
Post a Comment